Back in 1981 this is what they thought of news migrating to the internet. Note they saw no economic issues!
« Green shoots? | Main | Google Internet Summit 2009 »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b49269e20120a582a022970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference It'll never catch on...:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Harold Evans: Pictures on a Page: Photo-journalism, Graphics and Picture Editing
Harold Evans: Essential English for Journalists, Editors and Writers (Pimlico)
Steven Barnett: The Rise and Fall of Television Journalism: Just Wires and Lights in a Box?
Vin Ray: The Television News Handbook: An Insider's Guide to Being a Great Broadcast Journalist
I love the caption "Richard Halloran - Owns Home Computer" :)
Posted by: David Astley | September 19, 2009 at 03:26 PM
Am I the only one seeing this? The Gutenberg print revolution gave us the Renaissance, then mass democracies. The IT revolution is now offering us desktop democracy. Self government by the people, for the people, is now a practical possibility. There is no longer the need for remote hierarchies of representatives & bureaucracies. The network of PCs that links us to the info can be the decision-making machine. Push a button for what you want, folks. But then, you gotta follow the majority decision. You get the responsibility that comes with devolved, local power. Screw up, you clean up. You can't go to the Big House for help. Bamberpanda
Posted by: Bamberpanda | September 22, 2009 at 12:33 PM
2 Hours to download AND only 20 cents for the street addition. Wow!
Posted by: Shawna Coronado | September 24, 2009 at 08:39 PM
Well they DID see economic issues.
There is constant talk about how it will compete with news "papers" and how the guy selling news papers will(not yet) loose his job. And the reporter talks about how they will NOT make money. If that isn't an economic issues, what is?
Posted by: derwaechter | October 15, 2009 at 08:35 AM